Open-Source Software Composition Analysis Tools Comparison

Introduction

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) is a critical component of modern application security, helping organizations identify and manage risks associated with third-party components and open-source software. With the increasing importance of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for supply chain security, selecting the right SCA tool has become essential for enterprises. This comprehensive comparison examines leading open-source SCA tools, evaluating their features, capabilities, and suitability for enterprise environments.

Core Open-Source SCA Tools

OWASP Dependency-Check

Dependency-Check is a straightforward yet powerful open-source tool specifically designed to identify known vulnerabilities in application dependencies. As one of the more established SCA tools, it offers reliable vulnerability detection with minimal configuration.

Key Features:

  • Scans project dependencies and identifies known vulnerabilities by cross-referencing them against several databases, including the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)

  • Supports multiple programming languages including Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, Ruby, and more

  • Generates detailed reports in multiple formats (HTML, XML, and JSON)

  • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines

  • Provides a command-line interface for automation in build scripts

  • Supports incremental scanning to improve performance

Dependency-Check is ideal for development teams seeking a straightforward vulnerability scanning solution that can be easily integrated into existing development workflows.

OWASP Dependency-Track

Unlike traditional SCA tools, Dependency-Track takes a comprehensive platform approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). This makes it particularly valuable for enterprise environments requiring robust supply chain security management.

Key Features:

  • Consumes and produces CycloneDX Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and Vulnerability Exploitability Exchange (VEX)

  • Provides full-stack component support for applications, libraries, frameworks, operating systems, containers, firmware, files, hardware, and services

  • Tracks component usage across every application in an organization’s portfolio

  • Identifies multiple forms of risk including components with known vulnerabilities, out-of-date components, modified components, and license risk

  • Integrates with multiple sources of vulnerability intelligence including NVD, GitHub Advisories, Sonatype OSS Index, Snyk, Trivy, and OSV

  • Incorporates support for the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) to help prioritize mitigation

  • Features a robust policy engine with support for global and per-project policies

  • API-first design makes it ideal for CI/CD environments

Dependency-Track excels at providing a complete platform for organizations that need to monitor component usage across their entire application portfolio and maintain compliance with security and licensing requirements.

Anchore’s Syft & Grype

Anchore offers two complementary open-source tools that work exceptionally well together: Syft for SBOM generation and Grype for vulnerability detection.

Syft

Syft is a CLI tool and Go library specifically designed for generating comprehensive Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs) from container images and filesystems.

Key Features:

  • Generates SBOMs for container images, filesystems, archives, and more to discover packages and libraries

  • Supports OCI, Docker and Singularity image formats

  • Performs Linux distribution identification

  • Creates signed SBOM attestations using the in-toto specification

  • Converts between SBOM formats, such as CycloneDX, SPDX, and Syft’s own format

  • Works seamlessly with Grype for vulnerability scanning

Grype

Grype is a vulnerability scanner that perfectly complements Syft by using the generated SBOMs to detect vulnerabilities in container images and filesystems.

Key Features:

  • Scans container images and filesystems for vulnerabilities

  • Compatible with SBOMs generated by Syft

  • Draws from a wide variety of vulnerability database sources, including Wolfi SecDB

  • Suitable for one-off detection for manual CVE mitigation and in automated CI pipelines

  • Available as a container image or binary installation

  • Easily integrates into CI/CD environments

The Syft and Grype combination is particularly effective for organizations using containerized applications, offering a comprehensive solution for SBOM generation and vulnerability scanning in modern, cloud-native environments.

Trivy

Developed by Aqua Security, Trivy is an open-source vulnerability scanner that has gained significant popularity due to its comprehensive capabilities and ease of use.

Key Features:

  • Generates SBOMs from container images, filesystems, and archives

  • Supports multiple image formats including OCI, Docker, and Singularity

  • Identifies Linux distributions within container images or filesystems

  • Integrates with Grype for enhanced vulnerability detection

  • Creates signed SBOM attestations

  • Converts between different SBOM formats (CycloneDX, SPDX, and Syft)

Trivy is well-suited for organizations looking for a comprehensive security tool that combines SBOM generation with vulnerability scanning in a single package.

Microsoft SBOM Tool

The SBOM Tool, created by Microsoft, is an enterprise-level, scalable tool designed specifically for generating SPDX 2.2 compatible Software Bills of Materials.

Key Features:

  • Generates SBOMs compatible with the SPDX 2.2 standard

  • Provides comprehensive artifact coverage for diverse arrays of artifacts

  • Employs libraries to automatically detect software components

  • Integrates with the ClearlyDefined API to populate license information for detected components

  • Offers instructions for building the SBOM tool as a docker image

The Microsoft SBOM Tool is particularly valuable for enterprise environments that require standardized, SPDX-compatible SBOMs and need to manage license compliance effectively.

OSS Review Toolkit (ORT)

The OSS Review Toolkit is a comprehensive FOSS policy automation and orchestration toolkit that helps organizations manage their open-source software dependencies strategically and efficiently.

Key Features:

  • Generates CycloneDX, SPDX SBOMs, or custom FOSS attribution documentation

  • Automates FOSS policy using risk-based Policy as Code for licensing, security vulnerability, InnerSource, and engineering standards checks

  • Creates source code archives for software projects and dependencies to comply with licenses

  • Consists of multiple tools including Analyzer, Downloader, Scanner, Advisor, Evaluator, Reporter, and Notifier

  • Can be used as a library, via command line interface, or via CI integrations

ORT provides a comprehensive solution for organizations that need to manage not only security vulnerabilities but also licensing compliance and other FOSS policy requirements.

Comparative Analysis and Selection Criteria

Feature Comparison

Tool SBOM Generation Vulnerability Scanning License Analysis Policy Engine Platform Focus
Dependency-Check No Yes Yes No Multiple languages
Dependency-Track Yes Yes Yes Yes Component analysis platform
Syft Yes No No No Containers, filesystems
Grype No Yes No No Containers, filesystems
Trivy Yes Yes No No Containers, artifacts
Microsoft SBOM Tool Yes No Yes No Enterprise SBOM generation
OSS Review Toolkit Yes Yes Yes Yes FOSS policy automation

Integration Capabilities

For enterprise environments, integration capabilities are crucial for incorporating security scanning into development workflows. All the tools reviewed offer command-line interfaces that can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines.

Dependency-Track stands out with its API-first design that makes it particularly well-suited for CI/CD environments. The documentation specifically mentions integration with JIRA for notification publishing, which can help automate the creation of tickets for identified vulnerabilities.

Syft and Grype are designed to work together seamlessly, with Grype using SBOMs generated by Syft to perform vulnerability scanning. This integration makes them particularly effective when used in combination.

Enterprise Suitability

For enterprise environments, several factors are particularly important:

  1. Scalability: Dependency-Track and Microsoft SBOM Tool are specifically designed with enterprise-level scalability in mind.

  2. Comprehensive Risk Management: Dependency-Track excels at identifying multiple forms of risk, including security vulnerabilities, outdated components, and license compliance issues.

  3. Policy Enforcement: Both Dependency-Track and OSS Review Toolkit offer robust policy engines that can enforce security and compliance requirements across the organization.

  4. Integration with Vulnerability Intelligence Sources: Dependency-Track integrates with multiple sources of vulnerability intelligence, providing comprehensive coverage.

Implementation Strategies

Tool Combinations for Maximum Effectiveness

For the most comprehensive coverage, organizations can combine multiple tools:

  1. SBOM Generation + Vulnerability Scanning: Use Syft for SBOM generation and Grype for vulnerability scanning, as they’re designed to work together seamlessly.

  2. Platform Approach + Specialized Tools: Use Dependency-Track as a central platform, with specialized tools like Syft, Trivy, or Microsoft SBOM Tool generating SBOMs that are then ingested by Dependency-Track.

CI/CD Integration

Integrating SCA tools into CI/CD pipelines is essential for modern DevSecOps practices. Based on the search results, a recommended approach is:

  1. Generate SBOMs as part of the build process using tools like Syft, Trivy, or Microsoft SBOM Tool.

  2. Submit the SBOM to a central platform like Dependency-Track for tracking and monitoring.

  3. Use vulnerability scanners like Grype or the scanning capabilities built into Dependency-Track to identify vulnerabilities.

  4. Set up notifications and integrate with issue tracking systems like JIRA to manage remediation efforts.

Conclusion

Open-source SCA tools offer powerful capabilities for managing software supply chain security and compliance. For enterprise environments, a combination of tools often provides the most comprehensive coverage.

Dependency-Track stands out as a central platform for organizations seeking a comprehensive approach to component analysis and risk management. When combined with specialized SBOM generation tools like Syft or Trivy, it provides an end-to-end solution for software supply chain security.

For organizations focusing specifically on container security, the combination of Syft and Grype offers a powerful and streamlined approach to SBOM generation and vulnerability scanning.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific requirements, existing technology stack, and security priorities. By understanding the strengths and capabilities of each tool, you can make an informed decision that enhances your organization’s software supply chain security posture.

References:

  1. https://owasp.org/www-community/Free_for_Open_Source_Application_Security_Tools
  2. https://www.aquasec.com/cloud-native-academy/supply-chain-security/sbom-tools/
  3. https://fossa.com/blog/sca-vs-sast-comparing-security-tools/
  4. https://www.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/13xrpmc/friends_needs_help_choosing_solution_for_sbom/
  5. https://cloudfuel.eu/blog/cloud-container-scanning-showdown-which-tool-is-best/
  6. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/308560/20241203/top-5-software-composition-analysis-tools-2025.htm
  7. https://oss-review-toolkit.github.io/ort/docs/intro
  8. https://github.com/anchore/syft
  9. https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/staying-secure/working-with-scanners/grype-tutorial/
  10. https://www.checkops.com/dependency-check/
  11. https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-track/
  12. https://github.com/magnologan/awesome-sca
  13. https://www.stakater.com/post/open-source-container-security-a-deep-dive-into-trivy-clair-and-grype
  14. https://anchore.com/opensource/
  15. https://docs.dependencytrack.org
  16. https://snyk.io/product/open-source-security-management/
  17. https://www.wiz.io/academy/open-source-container-security-tools
  18. https://www.jit.io/resources/appsec-tools/10-sca-security-tools-to-protect-your-code-in-2023
  19. https://www.reddit.com/r/docker/comments/1fvwd5z/best_docker_vulnerability_scanner/
  20. https://owasp.org/www-community/Source_Code_Analysis_Tools
  21. https://coheigea.blogspot.com/2023/04/open-source-software-composition.html
  22. https://www.aikido.dev/blog/top-10-software-composition-analysis-sca-tools-in-2025
  23. https://www.upwind.io/glossary/the-top-6-open-source-sbom-tools
  24. https://research.aimultiple.com/sca-tools/
  25. https://www.jit.io/resources/appsec-tools/a-guide-to-generating-sbom-with-syft-and-grype
  26. https://docs.dependencytrack.org/odt-odc-comparison/
  27. https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/software-composition-analysis-sca
  28. https://dependencytrack.org
  29. https://www.activestate.com/blog/software-composition-analysis-sca-tools-compared/
  30. https://github.com/anchore/grype/issues/796
  31. https://fossa.com/learn/software-composition-analysis/
  32. https://finitestate.io/blog/best-tools-for-generating-sbom
  33. https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-track/
  34. https://www.jit.io/resources/cloud-sec-tools/top-8-open-source-kubernetes-security-tools-and-scanners
  35. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_aptgb7blw
  36. https://cyclonedx-bom-tool.readthedocs.io/en/v3.3.0/usage.html
  37. https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track
  38. https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/7850
  39. https://cycode.com/blog/sca-tools-guide/
  40. https://fossid.com/news/leveraging-ort-from-a-commercial-code-scanner/
  41. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QagOjEVis2k
  42. https://coguard.io/post/docker-security-snyk-grype-trivy-coguard
  43. https://dev.to/stefanalfbo/convert-with-cyclonedx-k0e
  44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv6zQ4bAeGk
  45. https://dev.to/chainguard/deep-dive-where-does-grype-data-come-from-n9e
  46. https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy
  47. https://bito.ai/blog/owasp-dependency-check/
  48. https://safeer.sh/generating-cyclonedx-software-bill-of-materials-with-anchore-syft
  49. https://www.chainguard.dev/unchained/vexed-then-grype-about-it-chainguard-and-anchore-announce-grype-supports-openvex
  50. https://aquasecurity.github.io/trivy/v0.17.2/
  51. https://jeremylong.github.io/DependencyCheck/dependency-check-jenkins/index.html
  52. https://blog.stephane-robert.info/docs/securiser/analyser-code/dependency-track/
  53. https://plugins.jenkins.io/dependency-track/
  54. https://www.infracloud.io/blogs/manage-vulnerabilities-dependency-track/
  55. https://www.axopen.com/blog/2022/09/dependency-track/
  56. https://sbom.observer/comparison/sbom-observer/vs/dependency-track
  57. https://nest.owasp.org/projects/dependency-track
  58. https://docs.dependencytrack.org/getting-started/configuration/
  59. https://www.syskit.com/blog/implementing-owasp-dependency-track/
  60. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpNnxpIBBk0
  61. https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track/discussions/3988
  62. https://github.com/DependencyTrack
  63. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-source-vulnerability-scanners-valery-levchenko-lfdqf
  64. https://anchore.com/blog/new-syft-feature-location-annotations/
  65. https://github.com/anchore/syft/wiki
  66. https://pypi.org/project/anchore-syft/
  67. https://www.aquasec.com/news/kubernetes-vulnerability-scanning-trivy/
  68. https://owasp.org/www-project-developer-guide/draft/implementation/dependencies/dependency_track/
  69. https://www.reversinglabs.com/blog/owasp-dependency-track-update-key-changes-and-limitations-on-software-risk-management
  70. https://docs.dependencytrack.org/integrations/rest-api/
  71. https://devsec-blog.com/2024/03/a-practical-approach-to-sbom-in-ci-cd-part-iii-tracking-sboms-with-dependency-track
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *