Introduction

Low-code enterprise systems are being adopted by an increasingly diverse spectrum of managers across organizations, reflecting a fundamental shift in how business applications are conceptualized, built, and deployed. This adoption cuts across functional departments, organizational hierarchies, and technical skill levels, creating a new landscape where traditional boundaries between business and technology are being redrawn.

Types of Managers

Business Technologists

Business technologists represent perhaps the most prominent category of managers adopting low-code platforms. These professionals occupy a unique position within modern enterprises, understanding both business processes and technology capabilities while functioning as essential bridges between business requirements and technical implementation. According to Gartner’s predictions, business technologists are expected to comprise 80% of low-code development users by 2026, up from 60% in 2021. These managers typically operate outside traditional IT departments yet maintain awareness of enterprise-wide architectural concerns, using low-code platforms to enable rapid experimentation and deployment without sacrificing governance, security, or integration capabilities. The strategic importance of business technologists stems from their ability to compress development timelines, democratize technology creation, embed governance into development workflows, and maintain the integration and scalability requirements that enterprises demand. They leverage low-code platforms as essential strategic tools for achieving digital transformation while maintaining organizational agility.

Chief Information Officers

CIOs have emerged as primary champions of low-code adoption, with 86% now considering these platforms a critical part of their technology strategy according to Kissflow’s 2025 CIO Low-Code Strategy Pulse Report. This widespread adoption among IT leadership reflects recognition that the traditional, IT-only model for application development can no longer keep pace with business demands. CIOs are turning to low-code platforms to accelerate application delivery, reduce costs, and address mounting IT backlogs while facing talent shortages. For IT leaders, low-code adoption is driven by several compelling factors including executive pressure (27%), overwhelming application backlogs (26%), and the need to modernize legacy systems. These executives measure success primarily through reduced development costs (57% of CIOs cite this metric), while prioritizing AI capabilities as the most important differentiator when selecting platforms. Primary use cases among CIOs include developing internal tools such as workflows and approvals (71%), legacy system modernization (48%), and expanding ERP or CRM functionality (45%)

Enterprise Architects

Enterprise architects play a pivotal role in low-code adoption, responsible for conceptualizing standardized processes that help align business IT infrastructure with digital operations and strategic business goals.

Their involvement has evolved from technical oversight to providing high-level strategic guidance, developing architectural frameworks that guide platform use across organizations. These professionals focus on creating policies ensuring that applications built with low-code tools align with the company’s overall IT strategy, data governance policies, and security requirements. According to research from KPMG, 91% of companies assign responsibility for low-code guidelines to IT department managers, with 90% of these managers prioritizing scalability, comprehensive developer tools, and security when choosing platforms. Enterprise architects emphasize integration and interoperability, placing greater focus on designing comprehensive integration architectures that handle the diversity of applications being created. Their strategic concerns include platform selection, ecosystem management, governance and quality assurance, and ensuring applications can perform at enterprise scale.

Operations Managers Across Departments

Operations managers represent the largest group of departmental leaders adopting low-code platforms, with 33% of citizen development occurring in operations departments. These managers face inefficiencies that translate directly into lost time, delayed decision-making, and missed revenue opportunities, making low-code platforms transformative solutions to operational challenges. Operations managers use these platforms to automate repetitive operational steps, break down system silos through integration, and build highly customized tools that match exact operational processes Low-code platforms enable operations managers to consolidate multiple operational tools into single applications with built-in automation capabilities, facilitating seamless scaling while boosting team productivity. Field operations managers particularly benefit from low-code adoption, using these platforms to create custom apps for field teams without massive IT builds, enabling direct process creation from the field.

The agility provided by low-code allows operations teams to test new approaches, iterate based on real-world results, and continuously optimize workflows without being locked into rigid systems.

Finance and HR Department Managers

Finance managers are increasingly adopting low-code platforms, representing 25% of citizen development activity. Financial institutions are using these platforms to accelerate digital transformation and meet evolving market demands, with adoption increasing by 40% in 2023. Finance managers leverage low-code to create and modify loan application processes, build custom portfolio analysis tools, automate workflows for client onboarding and KYC processes, and create dynamic dashboards providing real-time insights into market trends and operational metrics. The main benefits for finance leaders include reduced development time (up to 70% faster), greater agility to adapt to market changes, improved operational efficiency, and the ability to innovate rapidly

HR managers account for 23% of citizen development, using low-code platforms to handle numerous employee management tasks including performance management, talent management, benefits administration, absence management, and applicant tracking. These platforms enable HR departments to develop apps for recruiting, hiring processes, training, payroll, requests for paid time off, and vacation requests. Implementation of low-code technology in HR brings faster software delivery, increased productivity, enhanced accessibility for non-technical HR teams, improved collaboration between IT and HR, and scalable solutions that can be swiftly deployed or enhanced in response to evolving business requirements.

Product Managers

Product managers are leveraging low-code platforms to take a more hands-on role in building internal tools and product features, enabling more direct translation of product vision into tangible outputs. These platforms turn the “idea to working agent” process into a fast, low-risk loop that product managers can execute without waiting on engineering sprints. For product managers, low-code provides faster prototyping (launching agents in days rather than weeks), lower engineering dependency, better iteration with built-in evaluation tools, and proven ROI with 70% of enterprises reporting faster time-to-value; Product managers use low-code to quickly build and iterate on product ideas, accelerating the validation process and enabling rapid prototyping. This capability allows PMs to test concepts, gather feedback, and make informed decisions much faster than traditional development processes permit. The empowerment of product managers through low-code represents a fundamental shift in their role, expanding their capabilities beyond requirements gathering and strategic planning to actual hands-on building.

C-Suite Executives and Strategic Sponsors

Low-code adoption has become a top-down decision, with entire C-suites advocating for these technologies. According to research from Mendix, 75% of C-suite view low-code as core to business strategy, with almost half of organizations stating the COO (48%) and CEO (47%) are heavily involved in decision-making surrounding low-code adoption. Executive sponsorship proves crucial for driving adoption across organizations, as leadership support signals commitment and helps overcome resistance to change. COOs and CEOs are involved because low-code is having organizational impact through digital transformation (53% of respondents rank this as their leading use case), improving legacy processes (44%), and reducing operational costs (45%). Upper management support for strategic investments into technologies reached 68% agreement among respondents, highlighting enthusiasm for digital transformation initiatives at the highest organizational levels.

Citizen Developers

While not traditionally considered “managers,” citizen developers represent a crucial adoption category that often includes managers and supervisors across departments. These are employees without formal coding backgrounds who work alongside IT teams to address the growing demand for applications. Research indicates that 41% of non-IT employees are already building or customizing technology solutions, with 39% of firms currently using low-code development to empower developers outside of IT. Citizen developers typically include field supervisors, technicians, operations leads, business analysts, and department managers who use drag-and-drop workflows and real-time tools to drive innovation. By 2025, citizen developers are expected to outnumber professional developers by 4 to 1, with 80% of companies believing that citizen developers have provided their IT personnel with more flexibility and capacity. The adoption of low-code enterprise systems spans an extraordinarily broad spectrum of managerial roles, united not by their position in organizational hierarchies but by their need to solve business problems quickly, their proximity to operational challenges, and their desire to innovate without being constrained by traditional development cycles. This democratization of technology creation represents a fundamental transformation in how enterprises approach application development, moving from centralized IT-driven models to distributed, business-led innovation supported by appropriate governance frameworks. The managers adopting these systems share common characteristics including willingness to learn new technical approaches, frustration with IT backlogs and slow traditional development, deep understanding of their domain-specific business processes, and recognition that speed and agility have become competitive necessities in rapidly evolving markets.

References:

Introduction

The democratization of software development through low-code and no-code platforms has fundamentally transformed how organizations manage customer relationships. Citizen developers – non-technical professionals empowered to build applications through visual, accessible interfaces – have emerged as key players in this transformation, particularly in creating and customizing customer resource management systems. Understanding how to leverage these platforms effectively represents a critical skill for modern business technologists.

Understanding Citizen Development and CRM

Citizen development represents a paradigm shift in how organizations approach digital solutions. Rather than waiting months for IT departments to develop customized features, citizen developers can rapidly prototype, deploy, and iterate on solutions that address specific business problems. In the context of customer resource management, this democratization enables sales managers, customer service teams, and operations professionals to build tailored CRM solutions that precisely fit their operational workflows without requiring professional developer involvement. The traditional CRM landscape has long presented challenges for organizations seeking flexibility without complexity. Enterprise CRM platforms like Salesforce offer comprehensive functionality but require significant customization efforts and external consulting to adapt to unique business processes. Low-code CRM platforms bridge this gap by providing drag-and-drop functionality for creating custom contact fields, automated workflows for lead management, and pre-built components for sales pipelines and customer support workflows. This approach transforms CRM from a rigid system imposed upon business processes into a flexible tool that evolves alongside organizational needs.

The Core Value Proposition for Business Users

For citizen developers, building custom CRM solutions delivers several strategic advantages over off-the-shelf systems. The first advantage is rapid deployment. Traditional CRM implementations can consume months of development cycles, whereas low-code platforms compress this timeline to weeks or even days. A sales manager can identify a specific gap in their current CRM – such as the need to track customer gifts during sales cycles or manage complex multi-stage deals – and develop a targeted solution without waiting for IT intervention. This acceleration fundamentally changes an organization’s ability to respond to market changes and adapt to evolving customer needs. The second advantage is customization depth that matches organizational reality. Every organization manages its customer relationships differently, yet commercial CRM systems force companies to adapt their processes to the software’s predetermined logic. Citizen developers using low-code platforms can build pipelines that reflect actual sales processes, create custom data fields that capture industry-specific information, and implement workflow automation rules that match their organization’s unique decision-making patterns. This tailored approach ensures that the CRM system becomes an extension of how teams actually work, rather than imposing artificial constraints on business operations. Cost efficiency represents a third significant advantage. Low-code CRM development eliminates the need for expensive external IT consulting and reduces the overall development effort required to implement and customize systems. Organizations can redirect resources spent on traditional CRM customization toward strategic initiatives and business development rather than paying premium rates for professional developers to implement relatively straightforward business logic

Essential CRM Capabilities for Citizen Developers

Building an effective customer resource management system requires citizen developers to understand the fundamental building blocks that comprise modern CRM functionality.

• Contact management serves as the foundational capability, providing a centralized repository where all customer and prospect information is stored, organized, and easily retrieved by authorized team members. Effective contact management in low-code systems typically includes custom fields for industry-specific data, contact segmentation capabilities that enable dynamic grouping based on attributes or behaviors, and communication history logging that automatically captures emails, calls, and meetings associated with each contact
• Sales pipeline management represents the second critical capability. A well-designed pipeline visualizes the customer journey by establishing distinct deal stages – from initial prospect contact through proposal, negotiation, and close – and tracks how each opportunity moves through these stages. Low-code platforms enable citizen developers to create multiple pipelines for different deal types, automate the routing of opportunities based on predefined rules, and provide visibility across the entire pipeline through intuitive dashboards that show deal progression and pipeline health.
• Lead management and routing automation constitutes the third essential capability. As leads enter the system from various sources – website forms, email inquiries, phone calls, social media, or marketing campaigns – automated workflows can immediately assess lead characteristics and route them to the most appropriate sales representative based on territory, skill set, or current workload. This automation ensures that high-quality leads reach the right person quickly, significantly improving conversion rates and reducing the likelihood of leads falling through organizational cracks
• Task and reminder automation represents a fourth critical element. Citizens developers can build automated workflows that trigger follow-up reminders, task assignments, and escalation notifications based on time elapsed since last contact, deal stage transitions, or other business triggers. This automation maintains consistent communication cadence, ensures timely follow-ups, and prevents the organizational phenomenon where promising leads cool off due to forgotten or delayed contact attempts.
• Communication tracking and integrated messaging capabilities enable citizen developers to create systems where all customer interactions – emails, calls, notes, and meetings – are automatically logged and associated with the appropriate customer record. This comprehensive interaction history provides every team member immediate access to the complete engagement context, enabling more informed and personalized customer communications

Building Workflows That Drive Business Results

Citizen developers with CRM experience recognize that workflow automation represents the bridge between data capture and business outcomes.

Beyond simple lead routing and reminder notifications, sophisticated workflows can orchestrate complex business processes that involve multiple systems and teams. A citizen developer can build a workflow that automatically generates invoices from approved purchase orders, sends customer confirmation emails, creates internal task assignments for fulfillment teams, and logs the entire sequence back into the CRM for customer visibility – all without writing traditional code. Customer support automation provides another powerful use case. A citizen developer can create a workflow that accepts customer inquiries through multiple channels (email, web forms, chat), automatically categorizes them based on content analysis, assigns them to appropriate support specialists based on expertise and workload, provides customers with automated acknowledgments and status updates, and escalates unresolved issues after specified timeframes. These automated support systems significantly improve response times while freeing support staff to focus on complex issues requiring human judgment. Client onboarding workflows demonstrate how citizen developers can apply CRM systems beyond traditional sales contexts. By combining document management, data collection, task automation, and communication features, citizen developers can create onboarding experiences that automatically send welcome packages, collect required documentation through integrated forms, trigger background checks or verification processes, create team access accounts, and maintain clear visibility of onboarding progress. This automated orchestration dramatically reduces onboarding time while ensuring consistent processes that incorporate best practices.

Governance and Security Considerations

As citizen developers expand their role in building business-critical systems, governance becomes not an obstruction but rather an essential enabler of sustainable growth. Organizations that establish robust governance frameworks – including clear approval processes, data access protocols, and security standards – create environments where citizen developers can innovate rapidly and safely within defined boundaries. A governance structure begins with establishing a Center of Excellence (CoE), which functions as an enabler rather than a bureaucratic obstacle. The CoE provides reusable components such as standardized data models, pre-built workflow templates, connector libraries, and authentication modules that citizen developers can leverage rather than rebuilding from scratch. This approach simultaneously accelerates development and ensures consistency across applications. The CoE also maintains documentation of best practices, conducts regular training sessions on security and compliance requirements, and conducts architecture reviews that help identify potential issues before they become production problems. Data security represents a paramount concern when empowering citizen developers to build systems managing sensitive customer information. Non-technical users may lack complete understanding of data security best practices, potentially leading to unintended data exposure. Organizations must implement role-based access control (RBAC) that restricts user access based on clearly defined job functions, ensuring that team members access only the customer data necessary for their specific roles. A customer service representative may need access to customer contact information and order history, while a financial analyst might need access only to customer payment status without seeing contact information. Data encryption both at rest and in transit represents another essential security measure. Modern low-code CRM platforms typically provide encryption capabilities by default, but citizen developers must understand configuration options and ensure appropriate encryption levels for their use cases. Similarly, secure API management prevents unauthorized access to customer data through integration points, and multi-factor authentication adds an additional layer of protection against unauthorized access. Organizations should mandate regular security reviews and audits of applications built by citizen developers, particularly those accessing sensitive data or managing critical business processes. This periodic assessment identifies potential vulnerabilities, ensures compliance with relevant regulations (such as GDPR or industry-specific standards), and enables proactive remediation before issues escalate.

Collaboration between citizen developers and IT departments during these reviews ensures that business context informs security decisions while technical expertise guides implementation.

Selecting the Right Platform

The choice of low-code platform profoundly impacts citizen developers’ ability to build effective CRM solutions.

Key evaluation criteria include the platform’s ability to integrate seamlessly with existing systems through APIs and webhooks, allowing data flow between the CRM and accounting systems, ERP platforms, marketing automation tools, and other business applications. A platform lacking robust integration capabilities forces citizen developers to manually move data between systems, introducing errors and inefficiency. Scalability represents another critical consideration. As organizations grow, their CRM systems must accommodate increasing customer data volumes, support additional users, and execute more complex workflows without degradation in performance or user experience. Citizen developers should evaluate whether their chosen platform can efficiently handle projected growth without fundamental architectural redesign. User experience design directly influences adoption success. Platforms featuring intuitive drag-and-drop interfaces, logical data organization, and customizable dashboards that reflect how teams actually work enable faster development and more effective usage than technically powerful but cognitively complex alternatives. When customer service representatives and sales managers find their CRM a pleasure rather than a burden to use, adoption increases and data quality improves accordingly. The availability of comprehensive documentation, training resources, and community support affects citizen developer productivity and success rates. Platforms offering online tutorials, active user communities, responsive support channels, and regularly updated best practice guides enable citizen developers to overcome obstacles quickly and learn advanced techniques that expand solution possibilities.

Real-World Applications and Use Cases

Citizen developers have successfully applied low-code CRM platforms across diverse business scenarios. In sales organizations, citizen developers have built custom pipelines that track not only traditional deal metrics but also relationship depth, decision-maker engagement, and competitive positioning specific to their industry. These customized pipelines provide richer context than standard commercial CRM implementations, enabling more informed sales strategy discussions and more accurate forecasting. In service-based businesses, citizen developers have combined CRM functionality with project management capabilities to create integrated systems that manage customer relationships while simultaneously tracking project delivery, resource allocation, and professional services profitability. These combined systems ensure that customer service remains aligned with project realities and that project constraints don’t compromise customer satisfaction. In regulated industries, citizen developers have built CRM systems incorporating compliance checkpoints, audit trails, and restricted access controls that ensure regulatory requirements are embedded into daily business processes rather than imposed as separate compliance systems. These approaches reduce compliance risk while maintaining operational efficiency. The common thread across successful implementations is that citizen developers build systems optimized for their organization’s actual business processes rather than accepting the constraints of off-the-shelf systems. This optimization translates into higher user adoption, better data quality, faster decision-making, and ultimately stronger customer relationships.

Conclusion

Customer resource management has emerged as a defining domain for citizen developers, combining accessibility with significant business impact. By enabling non-technical professionals to build CRM solutions tailored to their organizations’ unique requirements, low-code platforms democratize a capability previously restricted to professional developers and expensive consultants. When implemented with appropriate governance, security controls, and platform selection discipline, citizen-developed CRM systems deliver superior flexibility, faster time-to-value, and lower total cost of ownership compared to traditional approaches. The evolution of CRM from a rigid system imposed upon business processes to a flexible tool shaped by those who understand business requirements represents a fundamental democratization of enterprise software development, with citizen developers positioned at the center of this transformation

References:

Introduction

Digital sovereignty has transformed from an abstract regulatory concern into a defining strategic priority for organizations worldwide. As enterprises navigate geopolitical tensions, data localization requirements, and the risks of vendor lock-in, a distinct cadre of managers has emerged to champion this complex transformation. These leaders possess a unique combination of technical acumen, strategic vision, and cross-functional expertise that enables them to translate sovereignty objectives into operational reality. Understanding the types of managers who promote digital sovereignty reveals not only their individual competencies but also the organizational structures necessary to achieve technological autonomy in an interconnected world.

Types of Managers:

The Visionary Chief Executive Officer

At the apex of digital sovereignty initiatives stands the Chief Executive Officer, whose commitment determines whether sovereignty remains a compliance checkbox or becomes embedded in organizational DNA. Digital sovereignty demands CEO ownership because it intersects geopolitical realities, enterprise risk, and growth strategy simultaneously. Research demonstrates that digital initiatives with active executive sponsorship are significantly more likely to succeed, yet sovereignty requires CEOs to make uncomfortable decisions about cost, vendor relationships, and technological dependencies. Progressive CEOs recognize that sovereignty represents both defensive shield and competitive weapon. They understand that over 90 percent of Western data currently resides in infrastructure controlled by non-European providers, creating systemic vulnerability. These leaders view sovereignty not as isolation but as credible independence – the ability to operate autonomously during geopolitical shifts while maintaining access to global innovation. By treating sovereignty as a board-level strategic imperative rather than an IT responsibility, these CEOs ensure that technological choices align with long-term resilience and stakeholder trust. The CEO’s role extends beyond resource allocation to cultural transformation. They must communicate why digital autonomy matters to employees, customers, and investors, connecting technical architecture decisions to business continuity and competitive positioning. In organizations where CEOs champion sovereignty, the conversation shifts from reactive compliance to proactive value creation, positioning independence as a differentiator in markets where trust and control define competitive advantage.

The Strategic Chief Information Officer

The Chief Information Officer occupies the critical juncture between business strategy and technical implementation in sovereignty initiatives.

CIOs can no longer afford to ignore digital sovereignty, as it directly impacts their ability to manage risk, ensure operational continuity, and maintain market access. These leaders must balance competing demands for cloud adoption, cost optimization, and regulatory compliance while building architectures that provide genuine control rather than the illusion of it. Forward-thinking CIOs approach sovereignty through a three-dimensional framework encompassing data residency, operational control, and technical independence. They evaluate cloud providers not merely on performance metrics but on jurisdictional integrity, access governance, and the ability to enforce sovereignty in practice. This requires CIOs to embed sovereignty considerations into risk registers, business continuity planning, and executive governance frameworks, ensuring it becomes a leadership priority rather than an afterthought. The most effective CIOs recognize that sovereignty is not an all-or-nothing proposition but requires calibrated approaches based on data sensitivity and regulatory context. They implement what analysts term “minimum viable sovereignty” – focusing resources on areas where sovereignty is genuinely critical while avoiding the decision paralysis and cost inflation that accompany overengineering. By orchestrating collaboration among legal, compliance, security, and business teams, these CIOs transform sovereignty from a technical constraint into an enabling capability that supports innovation within appropriate boundaries.

The Chief Sovereignty Officer

The creation of dedicated Chief Sovereignty Officer roles signals the maturation of digital sovereignty from concept to operational discipline. T-Systems pioneered this executive position in 2025, appointing its first Chief Sovereignty Officer to develop comprehensive sovereignty strategies tailored to customer-specific, regulatory, and geopolitical requirements. This role consolidates responsibility for defining sovereignty value propositions across the entire portfolio, ensuring that sovereignty challenges are addressed systematically rather than through fragmented initiatives. Chief Sovereignty Officers function as strategic architects who translate abstract sovereignty principles into concrete organizational capabilities. They bridge regulatory frameworks, customer demands, and operational realities, developing differentiated offerings that address the growing market for sovereign solutions. Their mandate extends beyond compliance to competitive positioning, recognizing that enterprises increasingly demand sovereign cloud solutions to free themselves from hyperscaler dependence and regain control over their data. This role reflects a fundamental shift in how organizations structure accountability for digital autonomy.

Rather than distributing sovereignty responsibilities across multiple functions, Chief Sovereignty Officers create unified strategies that span security, infrastructure, vendor management, and customer engagement. They ensure that sovereignty becomes embedded in organizational processes and culture rather than remaining a technical afterthought, positioning it as both risk mitigation and market opportunity

The Chief Technology Officer

Chief Technology Officers play an essential role in establishing technical sovereignty – the foundation upon which data and operational sovereignty are built. Technical sovereignty focuses on ensuring control over digital infrastructure and software stacks without being bound by proprietary restrictions or supply chain uncertainties. CTOs who promote sovereignty prioritize open-source technologies that provide transparency, eliminate vendor lock-in, and enable organizations to customize solutions according to their specific needs. These leaders understand that avoiding over-dependence on foreign technology providers is not about isolation but about maintaining strategic options. They architect systems that operate across multi-cloud environments, using open standards and reversible architectures that preserve organizational flexibility.

By selecting technology platforms that provide visibility into source code and development practices, sovereignty-focused CTOs ensure their organizations can audit security independently and retain knowledge even as personnel transitions occur

Effective CTOs also recognize that technical sovereignty extends beyond software selection to encompass supply chain integrity. They assess whether hardware, firmware, and development tools contain dependencies that could expose organizations to geopolitical risk or surveillance. This comprehensive approach ensures that sovereignty is embedded throughout the technology stack, from logical infrastructure like applications and AI frameworks to physical infrastructure including chips, computing, and storage.

The Chief Information Security Officer

Chief Information Security Officers have emerged as critical sovereignty advocates because security and sovereignty have become inseparable in the modern threat landscape. Digital sovereignty provides the trust layer that enables organizations to adopt cloud transformation while maintaining appropriate control over sensitive workloads. CISOs who champion sovereignty recognize that their responsibilities extend beyond traditional perimeter defense to encompass jurisdictional control, access governance, and operational resilience under geopolitical uncertainty. Progressive CISOs assess sovereignty requirements by analyzing legal compliance obligations, data protection needs, business continuity vulnerabilities, and reputation management imperatives. They collaborate with board members, CIOs, CTOs, and legal teams to ground sovereignty strategies in organizational priorities, ensuring that security measures align with business objectives rather than impeding them. This cross-functional approach ensures sovereignty becomes integrated into enterprise architecture rather than bolted on as an afterthought. The most effective CISOs also understand that sovereignty encompasses operational dimensions – ensuring that critical infrastructure remains accessible and that sensitive systems are not exposed to foreign oversight or forced disclosure through extraterritorial legal demands. They implement controls that enforce data sovereignty requirements automatically through policy-as-code approaches, creating repeatable and auditable governance mechanisms that scale across complex environments.

By positioning sovereignty as both compliance necessity and competitive differentiator, these CISOs help organizations build resilience while maintaining trust with security-conscious stakeholders.

The Chief Data Officer

Chief Data Officers have become pivotal sovereignty champions because control over data represents the core dimension of digital autonomy.

Data sovereignty – the authority over data location, access, and regulatory adherence – provides the foundation for broader sovereignty objectives. CDOs who promote sovereignty develop governance frameworks that prevent data fragmentation, vendor lock-in, and loss of organizational control over critical information assets. Forward-thinking CDOs recognize that sovereignty is not merely a technology strategy but a leadership decision that reinforces trust, accountability, and foresight. They employ modern architectural patterns like data fabrics, knowledge graphs, and metadata-driven governance to unify data across enterprises while maintaining sovereignty principles. By treating data governance as a shared framework rather than top-down directives, these leaders build coalitions among business, IT, and compliance teams around common data objectives. The most successful CDOs position data sovereignty within the broader context of organizational resilience and competitive advantage. They understand that federated governance models – where data remains under local control but becomes accessible through secure, policy-driven frameworks – enable organizations to balance sovereignty requirements with the collaboration necessary for innovation. By embedding jurisdictional controls into data architecture from the outset, these leaders ensure regulatory alignment by design rather than as a reactive afterthought, reducing legal exposure and operational overhead in highly regulated environments.

Business Technologists

Business technologists represent a distinctive class of sovereignty promoters who bridge strategic business requirements and technical implementation capabilities. Unlike traditional IT professionals focused primarily on execution, business technologists understand both the strategic implications of digital sovereignty and the technical constraints that must be navigated to achieve independence from foreign technological dependencies. Their unique combination of business knowledge and technical expertise enables organizations to translate sovereignty objectives into actionable strategies while maintaining alignment throughout complex transformation processes. Research indicates that digital initiatives with active business technologist involvement are 27 percent more likely to be delivered on schedule and 31 percent more likely to stay within budget. This performance advantage stems from their ability to maintain focus on high-value functionality while managing scope and preventing the project bloat that commonly derails transformation efforts. Business technologists serve as crucial translators between sovereignty requirements and technical implementation capabilities, evaluating alternative approaches against business criteria to ensure initiatives align with strategic priorities, budget constraints, and organizational capabilities In the sovereignty context, business technologists apply their dual expertise to assess how low-code platforms, open-source solutions, and sovereign cloud architectures can deliver business value while maintaining organizational control. They understand how to apply AI capabilities within sovereignty frameworks and how to structure vendor relationships that preserve strategic flexibility. By serving as change catalysts who mobilize stakeholders and establish venues for action, business technologists accelerate the transformation journey while ensuring that sovereignty becomes embedded in business processes rather than remaining a technical abstraction.

Risk and Compliance Leadership

Risk officers and compliance leaders have evolved into essential sovereignty advocates as regulatory frameworks proliferate and geopolitical risks intensify. These managers recognize that digital sovereignty transcends compliance checklists to encompass strategic risk management, business continuity, and operational resilience. They ensure that sovereignty risks – including data residency exposure, extraterritorial legal claims, and vendor dependency vulnerabilities – are incorporated into enterprise risk registers and stress-tested through continuity planning scenarios. Progressive risk and compliance leaders help organizations navigate the complex web of regulations including GDPR, NIS2, DORA, and emerging frameworks that mandate specific sovereignty controls. They work with CISOs, CIOs, and legal teams to identify where sovereignty requirements are most critical, implementing graduated approaches that focus resources on sensitive data and regulated operations while avoiding over-investment in lower-risk areas. By quantifying sovereignty risks in business terms and presenting them to boards alongside other strategic vulnerabilities, these leaders ensure sovereignty receives appropriate executive attention and resource allocation. Compliance-focused sovereignty champions also play a crucial role in vendor management, ensuring that contracts incorporate sovereignty-specific provisions around data access, jurisdiction, operational control, and business continuity. They establish governance mechanisms that monitor compliance in near real-time, adapting quickly as regulations evolve across different jurisdictions. Their work ensures that sovereignty becomes operationalized through policies, procedures, and technical controls rather than remaining aspirational or theoretical.

The Strategic Procurement Leader

Procurement officers and vendor managers have emerged as unexpected but powerful sovereignty promoters because purchasing decisions directly shape organizational dependencies. Public procurement represents a powerful lever for steering digital technology toward greater sovereignty, with systematic inclusion of sovereignty, interoperability, and reversibility criteria transforming each purchase into a strategic act. These leaders recognize that sovereignty must be embedded in sourcing decisions from the outset rather than addressed after vendor relationships have created lock-in. Forward-thinking procurement managers implement policies that favor European or domestic digital solutions, particularly those based on open-source technologies, while facilitating SME participation and fostering competitive local ecosystems. They mandate that procurement decisions be publicly documented, including justifications for choosing proprietary software over open-source alternatives, creating transparency and accountability. By breaking large IT projects into smaller, modular components and implementing simplified bidding procedures, these leaders make it easier for sovereignty-aligned providers to compete. Vendor management leaders who champion sovereignty also conduct rigorous due diligence on supply chain integrity, evaluating whether providers’ headquarters, ownership structures, development activities, and data processing locations align with sovereignty objectives. They ensure contracts include provisions that protect organizational control even under geopolitical stress, such as commitments to contest government orders that could disrupt operations and partnerships with local entities to ensure business continuity. Through strategic supplier diversification and coordinated procurement frameworks, these leaders reduce concentration risk and preserve organizational options in volatile environments

The Cultural Architect – Change Management and Enablement Leaders

Change management specialists and organizational development leaders provide essential but often overlooked support for sovereignty initiatives. Digital sovereignty represents a fundamental transformation that requires cultural shifts, new competencies, and different ways of working. These managers understand that technology implementation without human enablement results in failed transformations, regardless of the technical solution’s quality.Effective change leaders develop comprehensive communication strategies that raise awareness of sovereignty risks and expected benefits, creating organizational understanding of why autonomy matters. They design adapted training programs according to user profiles and use cases, ensuring that employees at all levels possess the competencies necessary to operate sovereign systems effectively. By identifying and empowering internal ambassadors who promote adoption among peers, change managers accelerate acceptance and reduce resistance to new sovereignty-aligned tools and processes.

Conclusion

Digital sovereignty succeeds not through individual heroics but through orchestrated collaboration among these diverse leadership profiles. The managers who promote sovereignty most effectively recognize that autonomy requires contributions from executive vision, technical expertise, risk management, procurement discipline, ecosystem orchestration, innovation capacity, and change enablement working in concert. Organizations that distribute sovereignty responsibilities across these specialized roles while ensuring coordination through governance structures and shared objectives position themselves to navigate the complex geopolitical and regulatory landscape of the digital era. The future belongs to enterprises where sovereignty champions at all levels treat technological autonomy not as a constraint but as a strategic enabler – one that builds resilience, preserves options, maintains stakeholder trust, and creates sustainable competitive advantage in an uncertain world. By understanding and empowering the diverse types of managers who drive sovereignty initiatives, organizations transform abstract principles into operational realities that protect their digital destiny while enabling continued innovation and growth.

References:

Introduction

The enterprise technology landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Organizations are increasingly recognizing that artificial intelligence is no longer a competitive advantage but a necessity for survival. Yet the path to AI implementation reveals a critical gap between ambition and execution. Business technologists find themselves in the center of this challenge, tasked with integrating AI into existing enterprise systems while managing legacy complexity, resource constraints, and skills shortages. Low-code enterprise systems have emerged as the essential bridge between these competing demands, fundamentally reshaping how organizations achieve their AI goals.

The Convergence of Multiple Enterprise Challenges

Business technologists operate within an environment characterized by competing pressures that traditional development approaches cannot adequately address. The developer skills gap represents perhaps the most acute challenge, with projections suggesting a global shortage of approximately 4 million full-time developers by 2025. Simultaneously, organizations face the AI integration challenge, where legacy infrastructures often cannot support modern AI solutions, causing inefficiencies and compatibility problems. These challenges converge at a critical juncture where businesses cannot afford lengthy development cycles but lack the specialized talent to accelerate innovation through traditional coding methods. The modern enterprise also grapples with data silos and interdepartmental collaboration barriers, where different departments operate disconnected systems that impede AI implementation. Business technologists recognize that siloed data, incompatible legacy systems, and organizational rigidity all threaten the success of AI initiatives. Furthermore, enterprise-wide AI implementation now requires careful attention to governance, compliance, and ethical considerations that span regulatory frameworks, data protection standards, and operational risk management.

Why Traditional Development Falls Short for Enterprise AI

Traditional, line-by-line coding approaches to enterprise AI development present significant limitations that organizations increasingly cannot tolerate. Development cycles that extend across months or years render solutions obsolete before deployment, while the specialized expertise required in machine learning, data science, and AI systems architecture remains scarce and expensive. The skills deficit is particularly acute because traditional academic AI education often fails to prepare professionals for real-world implementation challenges, creating a gap between theoretical knowledge and practical operational requirements. The traditional path also creates organizational inefficiencies. Citizen developers and business technologists – individuals with deep domain expertise but limited formal programming training – remain largely excluded from technology creation. This exclusion forces organizations to funnel all innovation requests through IT departments that are already overwhelmed, creating lengthy approval cycles and slowing the organization’s ability to respond to market opportunities.

Low-code platforms fundamentally disrupt this paradigm by abstracting complex AI concepts into manageable components accessible to a broader range of users. Rather than requiring deep expertise in machine learning frameworks, complex APIs, and specialized programming languages, business technologists can leverage visual interfaces, pre-built components, and AI-powered code generation to create sophisticated AI applications.

The Strategic Role of Business Technologists

Business technologists occupy a unique position within modern enterprises – they understand both business processes and technology capabilities, functioning as essential bridges between business requirements and technical implementation. These professionals operate outside traditional IT departments, creating technology solutions that address specific business needs while maintaining awareness of enterprise-wide architectural concerns. Their success depends on accessing tools that enable rapid experimentation and deployment without sacrificing governance, security, or integration capabilities. The role of business technologists has expanded as organizations recognize that technology alone cannot drive digital transformation. Digital transformation requires hyper-awareness of market changes, informed decision-making based on data insights, and fast execution to capitalize on emerging opportunities. Low-code enterprise systems enable business technologists to operationalize this strategic imperative by transforming their domain expertise into functional AI-powered applications that directly address operational challenges.

Low-Code Systems as Enterprise AI Accelerators

Low-code enterprise platforms represent a fundamental acceleration mechanism for AI adoption within organizations.

These platforms combine visual development interfaces, pre-built AI components, and intelligent code generation to compress development timelines from months to weeks or even days. This acceleration occurs through several mechanisms that directly address enterprise AI challenges: pre-built AI models eliminate the need to develop machine learning capabilities from scratch, drag-and-drop interfaces reduce the technical barriers for business users, and pre-configured connectors enable seamless integration with existing enterprise resource planning systems, customer relationship management platforms, and legacy applications. The democratization of AI development through low-code platforms proves particularly valuable for enterprise environments where multiple departments must participate in technology creation. Citizen developers can now build sophisticated AI-powered applications addressing specific business challenges without relying on specialized data scientists or machine learning engineers. This capability directly addresses the organizational bottleneck where business users must wait for IT resources while market opportunities disappear. From an enterprise architecture perspective, low-code platforms provide standardized APIs, role-based access controls, audit logging, and compliance capabilities that are essential for enterprise AI deployments. These platforms typically include built-in governance frameworks that enable organizations to manage AI models centrally, ensuring consistent implementation of security policies and regulatory requirements across the organization.

This centralized governance approach proves critical as organizations navigate increasingly complex regulatory landscapes including the EU AI Act, GDPR, and evolving national AI regulations

Bridging the Governance-Innovation Gap

One of the most persistent challenges organizations face in AI implementation involves the tension between innovation velocity and governance requirements. Research reveals that approximately 30 to 50 percent of teams’ AI development time is consumed by compliance requirements or waiting for compliance teams to clarify practical requirements. This friction creates a development pattern where teams duplicate work, create one-off solutions that cannot be reused, and ultimately fail to unlock real business value from their AI investments. Low-code enterprise systems address this governance-innovation tension by embedding compliance mechanisms directly into the development process. Rather than treating governance as a post-development overlay requiring retrofitting and rework, low-code platforms integrate security, compliance monitoring, and audit logging into the development workflow itself. This approach enables organizations to move quickly and responsibly, with teams spending time solving valuable business problems rather than repeatedly re-creating experiments or navigating compliance obstacles. The integration of AI governance into platform foundations also accelerates the transition from experimental prototypes to organization-wide deployments. When governance and security are embedded from the outset, hand-off delays between development teams, compliance teams, and operations teams diminish significantly. Business technologists can confidently deploy AI applications knowing that compliance requirements have been satisfied throughout the development process.

Enabling Rapid Business Process Optimization

AI workflow automation represents one of the most immediate and impactful applications of enterprise AI, yet traditional development approaches render such automation economically unfeasible for many organizations. AI workflow automation uses artificial intelligence to intelligently automate business processes and tasks across systems and departments, learning from past execution patterns and adapting to complex scenarios that require understanding context and making nuanced decisions. Low-code platforms enable business technologists to implement AI workflow automation without the prohibitive cost and timeline requirements of traditional development. By providing intelligent workflow builders, process mining capabilities, and pre-trained AI models for common business scenarios, these platforms allow organizations to automate processes that drive measurable business value: 20 to 30 percent reductions in labor costs, 90 percent error reduction, and 25 to 40 percent productivity improvements across automated workflows. Organizations like Downer, a construction company, demonstrate the practical impact of this approach. By automating 23 processes using low-code process automation platforms, Downer saved over 3,350 development hours while enhancing operational efficiency across business units. These results reflect the fundamental efficiency gain that low-code enables: business technologists can rapidly deploy AI-powered automation addressing real operational challenges rather than waiting for scarce development resources to become availabl

Supporting Digital Sovereignty and Organizational Control

Business technologists increasingly recognize that enterprise technology choices carry strategic implications beyond operational efficiency. Digital sovereignty – the ability of organizations to maintain autonomous control over their digital assets, data, and technology choices – has evolved from theoretical concern to critical business imperative. Research indicates that by 2028, over 50% of multinational enterprises will implement digital sovereignty strategies, representing a dramatic increase from less than 10% today. Low-code platforms built on open-source foundations or deployed within private infrastructure provide business technologists with the architectural flexibility necessary to achieve digital sovereignty objectives. Rather than being locked into proprietary vendor solutions with limited customization possibilities, organizations using open-source low-code platforms retain source code transparency, can deploy within controlled jurisdictions, and maintain independence from external vendor dependencies. This sovereignty capability proves increasingly important as organizations navigate overlapping regulatory requirements across multiple countries and seek to maintain control over sensitive data and AI models.

Accelerating Technology Transfer and Cross-Functional Collaboration

Successful enterprise AI implementation fundamentally requires breaking down traditional boundaries between business and IT functions. Low-code platforms facilitate this collaboration by enabling business users to participate directly in application development rather than serving only as requirements providers. This collaborative model, involving citizen developers, business technologists, and professional developers, enhances alignment between technological capabilities and business requirements while enabling more integrated problem-solving and innovation. Business technologists benefit from the ability to leverage AI application generators that can analyze existing applications, recommend best practices, identify potential issues, and generate components based on patterns or requirements. This capability transforms technology transfer from a theoretical concept into practical operational reality, where domain experts can rapidly prototype solutions and validate concepts before broader deployment.

The reduction in prototype-to-production timelines enables organizations to iteratively develop AI solutions that directly address business problems rather than deploying solutions designed based on outdated assumptions.

Conclusion

The enterprise technology landscape has reached an inflection point where traditional development approaches cannot adequately address the convergence of AI transformation imperatives, skills shortages, governance complexity, and the need for organizational agility. Business technologists find themselves increasingly responsible for driving enterprise AI initiatives while operating within resource and skills constraints that were previously considered insurmountable obstacles. Low-code enterprise systems represent not a temporary expedient or niche solution category but rather a fundamental evolution in how enterprises will develop and deploy AI applications. These platforms directly address the core challenges that business technologists face: they compress development timelines, democratize technology creation, embed governance into development workflows, enable rapid experimentation and deployment, and maintain the integration and scalability requirements that enterprises demand. As organizations continue their digital transformation journeys, business technologists will increasingly leverage low-code platforms as essential strategic tools for achieving AI integration while maintaining governance, security, and organizational agility. The organizations that recognize this transformation and equip their business technologists with low-code enterprise platforms will gain significant competitive advantages in their ability to innovate rapidly, deploy responsibly, and ultimately harness the transformative potential of artificial intelligence.

References: